Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-CXH(U)X

The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD, 4012QD, left and right hand, Match & Feeder Reel, Front Drag, 10516-412
Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD
Feeder And Match
91.10 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio4.9:1
Maximum drag380kg / 837.76lbs
Weight380g / 13404oz
Line retireve per crank86 centimeter / 33858 inch
Ball bearings8

Technical Specifications

  • BrandDAIWA
  • The main category of the reelFeeder and match
  • Price range~ €249.33
  • Is saltwater resistantNo
  • Spare spoolNo
  • Reel size4012QD
  • Handle typeSingle handle
  • Drag typeFront drag
  • Handle orientationLeft, Right
  • Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT, 3000-CXH(U), left and right hand, Spinning Fishing Reel, Front Drag, 10435-305
Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT
Spinning
71.90 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.32 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight205g / 7.23oz
Line retireve per crank93 centimeter / 36.61 inch
Ball bearings5

Technical Specifications

  • BrandDAIWA
  • The main category of the reelSpinning
  • Price range~ €70.33
  • Is saltwater resistantNo
  • Spare spoolNo
  • Reel size3000-CXH(U)
  • Handle typeSingle handle
  • Drag typeFront drag
  • Handle orientationLeft, Right
  • Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150

Conclusion

Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD edges out Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-CXH(U)X with slightly better overall performance, especially on the durability (5.5 out of 10) and the ball bearings (8). Still, Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-CXH(U)X holds its own with strengths like a weight of 205g / 7,23oz and a gear ratio of 6.2:1, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.

What's the difference between Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD and Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT?

There are not much differences between the two comparables