Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD vs Delphin CarbonIX 2000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD
Feeder And Match
91.10 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio4.9:1
Maximum drag380kg / 837.76lbs
Weight380g / 13404oz
Line retireve per crank86 centimeter / 33858 inch
Ball bearings8
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €249.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4012QD
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150

Delphin CarbonIX
Spinning
49.70 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.88 out of 10
Ergonomics6.3 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight210g / 7.41oz
Line retireve per crank0 inch
Ball bearings5+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €42.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.12/227
Conclusion
Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD clearly outshines Delphin CarbonIX 2000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (380kg / 837,76lbs) and line retrieve per crank (86 centimeter / 33858 inch). While Delphin CarbonIX 2000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD and Delphin CarbonIX?
Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD
- With a maximum drag of 10 out of 10 (380kg / 837,76lbs), this reel offers excellent stopping power, giving fishermen the confidence to handle pressure situations with ease
- A line retrieve score of 8.1 out of 10 86 centimeter / 33858 inch), this reel offers quick and smooth line pickup, ideal for keeping up during active feeder sessions
Similar comparisons

Shimano 21 Nexave FI 1000X vs Shimano Super 4000 GT RD


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2500 S-XHX vs Shimano Super 4000 GT RD


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX


Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD vs Shimano 19 Stella 30000X


Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano 19 Stella 30000X vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2500 S-XHX


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX


Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 5000-C(U)X vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 5000-C(U)X vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2500 S-XHX


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX


Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R vs Shimano 19 Stella 30000X


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 5000-C(U)X


Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 5000-C(U)X


Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 4000-CX vs Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500(U)X vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX
