Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD
Feeder And Match
91.10 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio4.9:1
Maximum drag380kg / 837.76lbs
Weight380g / 13404oz
Line retireve per crank86 centimeter / 33858 inch
Ball bearings8
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €249.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4012QD
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.54 out of 10
Ergonomics5.91 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight535g / 18.87oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €161.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size30 LH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 400/0.4
Conclusion
Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD clearly outshines Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (380kg / 837,76lbs) and gear ratio (4.9:1). While Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD and Penn Squall II Conventional?
Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD
- The reel delivers balanced performance, suitable for most feeder and match situations without compromising too much on retrieve speed
- With a maximum drag of 10 out of 10 (380kg / 837,76lbs), this reel offers excellent stopping power, giving fishermen the confidence to handle pressure situations with ease
Similar comparisons

Shimano Tiagra 130AX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X


Shimano Tiagra 130AX vs Shimano Cardiff 301A


Shimano AERO XR 4000X vs Shimano Tyrnos 30 II


Daiwa TD FEEDER QD vs Daiwa TANACOM 800X


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX vs Shimano AERO XR 4000X


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Shimano Cardiff 301A


Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD vs Shimano Torium 30HGAL / Left-handedX


Shimano Cardiff 301A vs Daiwa TD FEEDER QD


Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD vs Daiwa TD FEEDER QD


Daiwa TD FEEDER QD vs Shimano AERO XR C3000X


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX vs Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD


Shimano AERO XR C3000X vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX


Shimano Torium 50HGA / Right HandX vs Shimano AERO XR 4000X


Shimano Tiagra 130AX vs Shimano AERO XR C3000X


Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Shimano Torium 50HGA / Right HandX


Shimano Torium 30HGAL / Left-handedX vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX


Shimano Tyrnos 30 II vs Shimano Torium 30HGAL / Left-handedX


Shimano Cardiff 301A vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX vs Shimano AERO XR C5000X
