Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD vs Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD
Feeder And Match
91.10 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio4.9:1
Maximum drag380kg / 837.76lbs
Weight380g / 13404oz
Line retireve per crank86 centimeter / 33858 inch
Ball bearings8
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €249.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4012QD
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150

Shimano Cardiff XR
Spinning
77.60 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.48 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight155g / 5.47oz
Line retireve per crank69 centimeter / 27.17 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €219.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC2000S
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/105
Conclusion
Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD edges out Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the ball bearings (8) and the maximum drag (380kg / 837,76lbs). Still, Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SX holds its own with strengths like a weight of 155g / 5,47oz and a ergonomics of 6.48 out of 10, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD and Shimano Cardiff XR?
Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD
- A line retrieve score of 8.1 out of 10 86 centimeter / 33858 inch), this reel offers quick and smooth line pickup, ideal for keeping up during active feeder sessions
- With a ball bearing score of 10 out of 10 (8), this reel feels exceptionally smooth and responsive, an ideal choice for demanding feeder and match fishing
Similar comparisons

Daiwa Nzon Distance 25 vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX


Daiwa TD FEEDER QD vs Shimano AERO XR C3000X


Delphin SHARX 6000X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MFEX


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MFEX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 4000FJX


Shimano Sedona FJ 4000FJX vs Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 2000 S-PX


Daiwa Nzon Distance 25 vs Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 2000 S-PX


Shimano Sedona FJ 4000FJX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 6000X


Delphin SHARX 6000X vs Daiwa Ninja LT 6000X


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MFEX


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X


Shimano AERO XR C5000X vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX


Delphin FRIZ vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 4000FJX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX


Shimano Sedona FJ 4000FJX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus Distance 25 QD vs Daiwa Ninja LT 6000X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX vs Delphin SHARX 6000X


Delphin SHARX 6000X vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX
