Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD vs Shimano Complex XR C2000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD
Feeder And Match
91.10 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio4.9:1
Maximum drag380kg / 837.76lbs
Weight380g / 13404oz
Line retireve per crank86 centimeter / 33858 inch
Ball bearings8
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €249.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4012QD
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150

Shimano Complex XR
Spinning
77.60 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.48 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight155g / 5.47oz
Line retireve per crank69 centimeter / 27.17 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €215.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.15/100
Conclusion
Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD edges out Shimano Complex XR C2000X with slightly better overall performance, especially on the ball bearings (8) and the maximum drag (380kg / 837,76lbs). Still, Shimano Complex XR C2000X holds its own with strengths like a weight of 155g / 5,47oz and a ergonomics of 6.48 out of 10, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD and Shimano Complex XR?
Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD
- A line retrieve score of 8.1 out of 10 86 centimeter / 33858 inch), this reel offers quick and smooth line pickup, ideal for keeping up during active feeder sessions
- With a ball bearing score of 10 out of 10 (8), this reel feels exceptionally smooth and responsive, an ideal choice for demanding feeder and match fishing
Similar comparisons

Shimano AERO XR C3000X vs Daiwa TD FEEDER QD


Shimano Catana 3000 SRC vs Shimano AERO XR C3000X


Delphin RAYA body vs Shimano AERO XR C3000X


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX vs Delphin YUPIE


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX vs Shimano 19 Stella 30000X


Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD vs Daiwa TD FEEDER QD


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X vs Daiwa TD Match 4012X


Shimano 19 Stella 30000X vs Shimano Catana 3000 SRC


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX vs Daiwa TD Match 4012X


Shimano AERO XR C3000X vs Daiwa Freams LT 5000D-CX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 4000DX vs Penn Battle III 2000X


Delphin RAYA body vs Daiwa TD Match 4012X


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000 HGX vs Shimano AERO XR C3000X


Shimano AERO XR C3000X vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X


Daiwa TD FEEDER QD vs Delphin YUPIE


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 4000DX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000 HGX


Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD vs Delphin RAYA body


Delphin YUPIE vs Shimano 19 Stella 30000X
