Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD
Feeder And Match
91.10 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio4.9:1
Maximum drag380kg / 837.76lbs
Weight380g / 13404oz
Line retireve per crank86 centimeter / 33858 inch
Ball bearings8
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €249.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4012QD
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150

Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000
Multireels
73.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.73 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.2:1
Maximum drag15kg / 33.07lbs
Weight1230g / 43.39oz
Line retireve per crank68 centimeter / 26.77 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €622.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/300
Conclusion
Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD edges out Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 with slightly better overall performance, especially on the ball bearings (8) and the gear ratio (4.9:1). Still, Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 holds its own with strengths like a durability of 5.73 out of 10, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD and Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000?
Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD
- The reel delivers balanced performance, suitable for most feeder and match situations without compromising too much on retrieve speed
- With a ball bearing score of 10 out of 10 (8), this reel feels exceptionally smooth and responsive, an ideal choice for demanding feeder and match fishing
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Shimano AERO XR C3000X vs Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX


Daiwa Nzon Distance 25 vs Shimano AERO XR C3000X


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U)


Shimano Torium 20HGA / Right handX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X


Daiwa Nzon Distance 25 vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X


Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX vs Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF


Delphin RAYA body vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX


Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX vs Daiwa Nzon Distance 25


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX


Delphin RAYA body vs Daiwa Sealine Ishidai H


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX vs Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U)


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X


Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX vs Daiwa Nzon Distance 25


Shimano AERO XR C3000X vs Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX


Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX vs Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U)


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX vs Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U)
