Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD vs Shimano Sedona FJ 4000FJX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.
Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD
Feeder And Match
91.10 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio4.9:1
Maximum drag380kg / 837.76lbs
Weight380g / 13404oz
Line retireve per crank86 centimeter / 33858 inch
Ball bearings8
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €249.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4012QD
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Shimano Sedona FJ
Spinning
46.10 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.03 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight290g / 10.23oz
Line retireve per crank75 centimeter / 29.53 inch
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €60.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000FJ
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.35/130
Conclusion
Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD clearly outshines Shimano Sedona FJ 4000FJX, offering significantly better performance in total score (9.11 out of 10) and gear ratio (4.9:1). While Shimano Sedona FJ 4000FJX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD and Shimano Sedona FJ?
Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD
- The reel delivers balanced performance, suitable for most feeder and match situations without compromising too much on retrieve speed
Shimano Sedona FJ 4000FJX
- With a score like 8.07 out of 10 (290g / 10,23oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons
Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD
Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX
Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX vs Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD
Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX
Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 2500DX vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 3000-CX
Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX vs Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD
Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT6000X
Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 3000-CX
Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 2500DX vs Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX
Daiwa 24 NZon Plus Distance 25 QD vs Delphin REDIX
Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT6000X vs Delphin REDIX
Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus Distance 25 QD
Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT6000X vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X
Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2000X vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 3000-CX
Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 2500DX
Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX vs Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 4000-CX
Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX
Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 2500DX vs Daiwa 21 Presso LT 2000 SS-PX
Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 2500DX
Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX vs Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 4000-CX