Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.
Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD
Feeder And Match
91.10 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio4.9:1
Maximum drag380kg / 837.76lbs
Weight380g / 13404oz
Line retireve per crank86 centimeter / 33858 inch
Ball bearings8
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €249.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4012QD
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Shimano Twin Power FE
Spinning
77.40 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.55 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank69 centimeter / 27.17 inch
Ball bearings9+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €365.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000SFE
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/105
Conclusion
Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD edges out Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the ball bearings (8) and the maximum drag (380kg / 837,76lbs). Still, Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX holds its own with strengths like a weight of 175g / 6,17oz and a ergonomics of 6.42 out of 10, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD and Shimano Twin Power FE?
Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD
- A line retrieve score of 8.1 out of 10 86 centimeter / 33858 inch), this reel offers quick and smooth line pickup, ideal for keeping up during active feeder sessions
- With a ball bearing score of 10 out of 10 (8), this reel feels exceptionally smooth and responsive, an ideal choice for demanding feeder and match fishing
Similar comparisons
Shimano Stella FK 4000 MX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX
Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX vs Shimano Stella FK 4000 MX
Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-C(U)X vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 3000D-CXH 3000D-CXHX
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-C(U)X
Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X
Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX
Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-C(U)X vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X
Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX
Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-C(U)X
Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X
Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX
Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-C(U)X vs Delphin SHARX 3000X
Delphin SHARX 3000X vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX
Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX
Shimano Stella FK 4000 MX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX
Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X vs Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX
Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX
Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX
Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX
Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX