Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD vs Shimano Cardiff 301A
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD
Feeder And Match
91.10 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio4.9:1
Maximum drag380kg / 837.76lbs
Weight380g / 13404oz
Line retireve per crank86 centimeter / 33858 inch
Ball bearings8
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €249.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4012QD
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150

Shimano Cardiff 301A
Multireels
34.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.69 out of 10
Ergonomics6.38 out of 10
Gear ratio5.8:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02 lbs
Weight252g / 8.89oz
Line retireve per crank61cm / 24.01 inch
Ball bearings4 A-RB + 1 RB
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €88.60
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size301
- Handle typeDouble handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.25/285. 0.30/235, 0.40/40 lb/yds:12/230, 14/180
Conclusion
Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD clearly outshines Shimano Cardiff 301A, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (380kg / 837,76lbs) and gear ratio (4.9:1). While Shimano Cardiff 301A may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD and Shimano Cardiff 301A?
Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD
- The reel delivers balanced performance, suitable for most feeder and match situations without compromising too much on retrieve speed
- With a maximum drag of 10 out of 10 (380kg / 837,76lbs), this reel offers excellent stopping power, giving fishermen the confidence to handle pressure situations with ease
- A line retrieve score of 8.1 out of 10 86 centimeter / 33858 inch), this reel offers quick and smooth line pickup, ideal for keeping up during active feeder sessions
Similar comparisons

Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X


Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X


Daiwa Tanacom 750 vs Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X vs Daiwa TD Match 3012X


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX vs Daiwa Tanacom 750


Shimano Cardiff 301A vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX


Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD vs Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus Distance 25 QD


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX vs Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD


Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Daiwa Tanacom 750


Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X


Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X


Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X


Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX
