Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX vs Delphin CarbonIX 1000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 24 TDR QD
Feeder And Match
83.60 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.09 out of 10
Gear ratio4.8:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight250g / 8.82oz
Line retireve per crank72 centimeter / 28.35 inch
Ball bearings8+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €230.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2508QD
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150

Delphin CarbonIX
Spinning
49.80 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.85 out of 10
Ergonomics6.32 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight204g / 7.2oz
Line retireve per crank0 inch
Ball bearings5+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €40.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.1/285
Conclusion
Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX clearly outshines Delphin CarbonIX 1000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs) and line retrieve per crank (72 centimeter / 28.35 inch). While Delphin CarbonIX 1000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 24 TDR QD and Delphin CarbonIX?
Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX
- With a maximum drag of 10 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), this reel offers excellent stopping power, giving fishermen the confidence to handle pressure situations with ease
- With a line retrieve of 72 centimeter / 28.35 inch (5.29 out of 10), this reel retrieves slowly.. suitable for relaxed feeder fishing
Delphin CarbonIX 1000X
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (5+1) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD


Shimano AERO XR C5000X vs Shimano Twin Power XD A C 5000 XGX


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX vs Shimano Twin Power FD C3000XGX


Shimano Ultegra C3000HGDX vs Shimano Twin Power FD C3000XGX


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX vs Shimano Stradic FM


Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500DX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000D-CXHX vs Shimano Twin Power FD C3000XGX


Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX


Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 5000-CX vs Shimano AERO XR C5000X


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500DX vs Shimano Stradic FM


Shimano AERO XR 4000X vs Shimano Complex XR C2000X


Shimano Complex XR C2000X vs Shimano AERO XR 4000X


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 5000-CX


Shimano Twin Power FD C3000XGX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX


Delphin RAYA body vs Daiwa 19 Certate 3000D-CX


Shimano Stradic FM vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X


Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD vs Delphin RAYA body
