Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX vs Delphin ELIXIR 2000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 24 TDR QD
Feeder And Match
83.60 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.09 out of 10
Gear ratio4.8:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight250g / 8.82oz
Line retireve per crank72 centimeter / 28.35 inch
Ball bearings8+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €230.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2508QD
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150

Delphin ELIXIR
Spinning
53.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.22 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag-
Weight235g / 8.29oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €17.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/390
Conclusion
Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX clearly outshines Delphin ELIXIR 2000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs) and line retrieve per crank (72 centimeter / 28.35 inch). While Delphin ELIXIR 2000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 24 TDR QD and Delphin ELIXIR?
Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX
- With a maximum drag of 10 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), this reel offers excellent stopping power, giving fishermen the confidence to handle pressure situations with ease
- With a line retrieve of 72 centimeter / 28.35 inch (5.29 out of 10), this reel retrieves slowly.. suitable for relaxed feeder fishing
Delphin ELIXIR 2000X
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3+1) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 2000X


Daiwa Crossfire LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 2500-HX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2500 S-XHX vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 500X


Daiwa Crossfire LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 4000-C(U)X vs Daiwa TD Match 4012X


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 2500-HX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 4000-C(U)X vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX


Daiwa TD FEEDER QD vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2000X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 4000-C(U)X vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2500 S-XHX


Shimano Catana FE C 3000 HGX vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 500X


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2000X vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 4000-C(U)X vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 2000X


Daiwa Crossfire LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500X


Daiwa Crossfire LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX


Shimano AERO XR C3000X vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 500X


Shimano Catana FE C 3000 HGX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X vs Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 4000-C(U)X vs Daiwa RX LT 2500X


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 500X vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2000X


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 500X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500X
