Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX vs Delphin HORNET 20X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 24 TDR QD
Feeder And Match
83.60 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.09 out of 10
Gear ratio4.8:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight250g / 8.82oz
Line retireve per crank72 centimeter / 28.35 inch
Ball bearings8+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €230.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2508QD
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150

Delphin HORNET
Spinning
57.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.55 out of 10
Ergonomics6.2 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag-
Weight240g / 8oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €22.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size20
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/400
Conclusion
Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX clearly outshines Delphin HORNET 20X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs) and line retrieve per crank (72 centimeter / 28.35 inch). While Delphin HORNET 20X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 24 TDR QD and Delphin HORNET?
Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX
- With a maximum drag of 10 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), this reel offers excellent stopping power, giving fishermen the confidence to handle pressure situations with ease
- With a line retrieve of 72 centimeter / 28.35 inch (5.29 out of 10), this reel retrieves slowly.. suitable for relaxed feeder fishing
Delphin HORNET 20X
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3+1) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Shimano AERO XR C3000X vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX


Shimano Stella FK 4000 XGX vs Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX


Shimano Stella FK 4000 XGX vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX


Shimano AERO XR C3000X vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 4000-CX


Daiwa Nzon Distance 25 vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX


Daiwa Nzon Distance 25 vs Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX


Shimano AERO XR C3000X vs Daiwa 19 Certate 4000CXHX


Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX vs Daiwa Nzon Distance 25


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X vs Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD


Shimano Stella FK 4000 XGX vs Shimano Twin Power FD 4000X


Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD vs Daiwa 19 Certate 4000CXHX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 4000CXHX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Twin Power FD 4000X


Shimano AERO XR 4000X vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX vs Shimano 20 Stella 18000 HGX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX vs Shimano 20 Stella 18000 HGX
