Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX vs Delphin INKS 2000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 24 TDR QD
Feeder And Match
83.60 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.09 out of 10
Gear ratio4.8:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight250g / 8.82oz
Line retireve per crank72 centimeter / 28.35 inch
Ball bearings8+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €230.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2508QD
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150

Delphin INKS
Spinning
54.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.53 out of 10
Ergonomics6.17 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag-
Weight250g / 8.82oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €21.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/400
Conclusion
Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX clearly outshines Delphin INKS 2000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs) and line retrieve per crank (72 centimeter / 28.35 inch). While Delphin INKS 2000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 24 TDR QD and Delphin INKS?
Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX
- With a maximum drag of 10 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), this reel offers excellent stopping power, giving fishermen the confidence to handle pressure situations with ease
- With a line retrieve of 72 centimeter / 28.35 inch (5.29 out of 10), this reel retrieves slowly.. suitable for relaxed feeder fishing
Delphin INKS 2000X
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3+1) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500-XHX vs Delphin MonoDRAG 2000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500SX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 FJX


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX


Daiwa 19 Certate 2500DX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X vs Delphin MonoDRAG 2000X


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000X vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX


Shimano AERO XR 4000X vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500SX vs Shimano Catana 4000 RC


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500SX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X


Delphin MonoDRAG 2000X vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 5000 HGX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500-XHX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 5000 HGX vs Shimano Catana 4000 RC


Delphin MonoDRAG 2000X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500SX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X
