Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX vs Delphin INKS 4000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 24 TDR QD
Feeder And Match
83.60 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.09 out of 10
Gear ratio4.8:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight250g / 8.82oz
Line retireve per crank72 centimeter / 28.35 inch
Ball bearings8+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €230.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2508QD
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150

Delphin INKS
Spinning
56.70 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.57 out of 10
Ergonomics6.07 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag-
Weight280g / 9.88oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €23.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.18/470
Conclusion
Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX clearly outshines Delphin INKS 4000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs) and line retrieve per crank (72 centimeter / 28.35 inch). While Delphin INKS 4000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 24 TDR QD and Delphin INKS?
Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX
- With a maximum drag of 10 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), this reel offers excellent stopping power, giving fishermen the confidence to handle pressure situations with ease
- With a line retrieve of 72 centimeter / 28.35 inch (5.29 out of 10), this reel retrieves slowly.. suitable for relaxed feeder fishing
Delphin INKS 4000X
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3+1) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Daiwa Crossfire LT 5000-CX vs Shimano FX 1000 FCX


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX


Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX


Daiwa Freams LT 6000D-HX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2500SX


Shimano FX 1000 FCX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X


Daiwa BG 2500X vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX


Shimano Sedona FJ 500 500X vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 5000-CX


Daiwa Crossfire LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2500SX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 3000X vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2500SX


Shimano Catana FE 4000X vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX vs Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD


Daiwa BG 2500X vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X


Shimano FX 1000 FCX vs Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus Distance 25 QD vs Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SX


Daiwa BG 2500X vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 5000-CX


Daiwa Crossfire LT 5000-CX vs Shimano Catana FE 4000X


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X vs Shimano Catana FE 4000X
