Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 24 TDR QD
Feeder And Match
83.60 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.09 out of 10
Gear ratio4.8:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight250g / 8.82oz
Line retireve per crank72 centimeter / 28.35 inch
Ball bearings8+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €230.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2508QD
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150

Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag
Spinning
43.10 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag-
Weight380g / 13.40oz
Line retireve per crank95cm / 37.40 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €19.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil0.30mm/270m
Conclusion
Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX clearly outshines Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs) and weight (250g / 8,82oz). While Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 24 TDR QD and Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag?
Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX
- With a maximum drag of 10 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), this reel offers excellent stopping power, giving fishermen the confidence to handle pressure situations with ease
- Rated 8.57 out of 10 (250g / 8,82oz) in weight, this reel strikes a great balance between sturdiness and lightness, making it great for consistent feeder casting
Similar comparisons

Daiwa BG 8000X vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX


Penn Battle III 3000X vs Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD


Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R vs Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD


Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X vs Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD


Delphin BRONZ 5000X vs Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD


Shimano Aero C5000X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000X vs Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R


Delphin BRONZ 5000X vs Penn Battle III 3000X


Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD vs Shimano AERO XR C3000X


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X vs Shimano Aero C5000X


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX


Penn Battle III 3000X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX


Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX


Shimano Vanquish FC C2500SCX vs Shimano Complex XR 2500 HGX


Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX


Penn Battle III 3000X vs Shimano AERO XR C3000X
