Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 1000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 24 TDR QD
Feeder And Match
83.60 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.09 out of 10
Gear ratio4.8:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight250g / 8.82oz
Line retireve per crank72 centimeter / 28.35 inch
Ball bearings8+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €230.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2508QD
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150

Shimano 21 Nexave FI
Spinning
50.20 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.82 out of 10
Ergonomics6.27 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag-
Weight220g / 7.76oz
Line retireve per crank66 centimeter / 25.98 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €39.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/140
Conclusion
Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX clearly outshines Shimano 21 Nexave FI 1000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs) and total score (8.36 out of 10). While Shimano 21 Nexave FI 1000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 24 TDR QD and Shimano 21 Nexave FI?
Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX
- With a maximum drag of 10 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), this reel offers excellent stopping power, giving fishermen the confidence to handle pressure situations with ease
- With a line retrieve of 72 centimeter / 28.35 inch (5.29 out of 10), this reel retrieves slowly.. suitable for relaxed feeder fishing
Shimano 21 Nexave FI 1000X
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (4) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 4000D-CXH 4000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 1000DX


Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 4000D-CXH 4000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-CXH(U)X


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX


Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX


Daiwa 19 Certate 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX


Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX


Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-CXH(U)X vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX


Penn FIERCE IV 3000X vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 1000DX


Daiwa 19 Certate 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 4000D-CXH 4000D-CXHX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 1000DX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX vs Daiwa Nzon Distance 25


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CPX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-CXH(U)X


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CPX vs Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF
