Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX vs Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 24 TDR QD
Feeder And Match
83.60 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.09 out of 10
Gear ratio4.8:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight250g / 8.82oz
Line retireve per crank72 centimeter / 28.35 inch
Ball bearings8+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €230.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2508QD
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150

Shimano Ultegra
Spinning
75.80 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.27 out of 10
Gear ratio6.4:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight220g / 7.76oz
Line retireve per crank94 centimeter / 37.01 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €132.00
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC3000XGD
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/130
Conclusion
Both Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX and Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX offers a gear ratio of 4.8:1, while Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX stands out for a ball bearings of 6. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa 24 TDR QD and Shimano Ultegra?
Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX
- The reel delivers balanced performance, suitable for most feeder and match situations without compromising too much on retrieve speed
Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD vs Daiwa GS LTD 4000X


Shimano Stella FK 2500X vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano Vanford FA 2500HGAX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX


Delphin IXTREK 3000X vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X vs Shimano AERO XR C5000X


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 5000D-CXHX


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X


Shimano AERO XR C5000X vs Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2500X vs Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2500X vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X


Shimano Stella FK 2500X vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 5000D-CXHX


Delphin IXTREK 3000X vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2500X


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX vs Daiwa GS LTD 4000X


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X vs Shimano AERO XR C3000X


Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX vs Shimano AERO XR C5000X


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2500X vs Shimano AERO XR C3000X


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX vs Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX
