Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX vs Daiwa TANACOM 800X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 24 TDR QD
Feeder And Match
84.40 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.94 out of 10
Gear ratio4.8:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight300g / 10.58oz
Line retireve per crank79 centimeter / 31.1 inch
Ball bearings8+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €229.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3012QD-DH
- Handle typeDouble handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150

Daiwa TANACOM
Multireels
72.40 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.71 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio2.1:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight1910g / 67.37oz
Line retireve per crank59 centimeter / 23.23 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €595.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size800
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.35/800
Conclusion
Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX edges out Daiwa TANACOM 800X with slightly better overall performance, especially on the weight (300g / 10,58oz) and the gear ratio (4.8:1). Still, Daiwa TANACOM 800X holds its own with strengths like a ball bearings of 4 and a durability of 5.71 out of 10, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa 24 TDR QD and Daiwa TANACOM?
Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX
- The reel delivers balanced performance, suitable for most feeder and match situations without compromising too much on retrieve speed
- Rated 8.29 out of 10 (300g / 10,58oz) in weight, this reel strikes a great balance between sturdiness and lightness, making it great for consistent feeder casting
- This reel provides steady retrieval 79 centimeter / 31.1 inch (6.29 out of 10), good enough for most feeder and match scenarios
Daiwa TANACOM 800X
- With premium bearings scoring 5 out of 10 (4), this reel delivers buttery smooth operation even with load
Similar comparisons

Daiwa Tanacom 750 vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Shimano Tyrnos 30 II


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X


Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX


Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX vs Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD


Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X


Delphin RAYA body vs Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX


Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X


Shimano AERO XR C5000X vs Shimano Tyrnos 30 II


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X vs Shimano AERO XR 4000X


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX vs Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X vs Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD


Daiwa Tanacom 750 vs Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX vs Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX


Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX


Shimano AERO XR 4000X vs Shimano AERO XR C3000X
