Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX vs Delphin CarbonIX 2000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 24 TDR QD
Feeder And Match
84.40 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.94 out of 10
Gear ratio4.8:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight300g / 10.58oz
Line retireve per crank79 centimeter / 31.1 inch
Ball bearings8+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €229.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3012QD-DH
- Handle typeDouble handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150

Delphin CarbonIX
Spinning
49.70 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.88 out of 10
Ergonomics6.3 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight210g / 7.41oz
Line retireve per crank0 inch
Ball bearings5+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €42.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.12/227
Conclusion
Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX clearly outshines Delphin CarbonIX 2000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs) and line retrieve per crank (79 centimeter / 31.1 inch). While Delphin CarbonIX 2000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 24 TDR QD and Delphin CarbonIX?
Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX
- With a maximum drag of 10 out of 10 (12kg / 26,46lbs), this reel offers excellent stopping power, giving fishermen the confidence to handle pressure situations with ease
- This reel provides steady retrieval 79 centimeter / 31.1 inch (6.29 out of 10), good enough for most feeder and match scenarios
Delphin CarbonIX 2000X
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (5+1) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX vs Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF


Shimano 19 Stella 14000 XGX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500X


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000CXHX


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX vs Penn Battle III 8000 HSX


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000CXHX


Shimano Stradic GTM 2500 RC Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500D-XHX


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X


Penn Battle III 8000 HSX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000CXHX


Shimano 19 Stella 14000 XGX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX vs Delphin YUPIE


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX vs Shimano Catana 1000 RC


Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000CXHX


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX


Shimano 19 Stella 14000 XGX vs Shimano Stradic GTM 2500 RC Spinning reel with fighting drag


Daiwa TD Match 4012X vs Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000CXHX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000CXHX vs Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000CXHX vs Shimano FX 4000 FCX


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X vs Delphin YUPIE
