Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX vs Delphin CarbonIX 3000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 24 TDR QD
Feeder And Match
84.40 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.94 out of 10
Gear ratio4.8:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight300g / 10.58oz
Line retireve per crank79 centimeter / 31.1 inch
Ball bearings8+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €229.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3012QD-DH
- Handle typeDouble handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150

Delphin CarbonIX
Spinning
49.50 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.92 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank0 inch
Ball bearings5+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €44.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/257
Conclusion
Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX clearly outshines Delphin CarbonIX 3000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs) and line retrieve per crank (79 centimeter / 31.1 inch). While Delphin CarbonIX 3000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 24 TDR QD and Delphin CarbonIX?
Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX
- With a maximum drag of 10 out of 10 (12kg / 26,46lbs), this reel offers excellent stopping power, giving fishermen the confidence to handle pressure situations with ease
- This reel provides steady retrieval 79 centimeter / 31.1 inch (6.29 out of 10), good enough for most feeder and match scenarios
Delphin CarbonIX 3000X
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (5+1) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Shimano Twin Power FE 2500SHGFEX vs Delphin ELIXIR 3000X


Shimano Complex XR 2500 HGX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX


Shimano Sahara FJ 1000X vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX


Shimano Catana FE 2500X vs Shimano Complex XR 2500 HGX


Shimano Ultegra C2500SHGDX vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus Distance 25 QD


Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 FJX vs Delphin ELIXIR 3000X


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX vs Shimano Catana FE C 3000 HGX


Shimano Sahara FJ 1000X vs Shimano Ultegra C2500SHGDX


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 FJX


Shimano Complex XR 2500 HGX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X vs Shimano AERO XR C3000X


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX


Shimano Catana FE C 3000 HGX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX


Shimano AERO XR C3000X vs Shimano Catana FE 2500X


Shimano Twin Power FE 2500SHGFEX vs Shimano Sedona FJ C2000SHGFJX


Shimano Sahara FJ 1000X vs Delphin ELIXIR 3000X
