Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX vs Delphin INKS 2000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 24 TDR QD
Feeder And Match
84.40 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.94 out of 10
Gear ratio4.8:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight300g / 10.58oz
Line retireve per crank79 centimeter / 31.1 inch
Ball bearings8+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €229.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3012QD-DH
- Handle typeDouble handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150

Delphin INKS
Spinning
54.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.53 out of 10
Ergonomics6.17 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag-
Weight250g / 8.82oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €21.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/400
Conclusion
Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX clearly outshines Delphin INKS 2000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs) and line retrieve per crank (79 centimeter / 31.1 inch). While Delphin INKS 2000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 24 TDR QD and Delphin INKS?
Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX
- With a maximum drag of 10 out of 10 (12kg / 26,46lbs), this reel offers excellent stopping power, giving fishermen the confidence to handle pressure situations with ease
- This reel provides steady retrieval 79 centimeter / 31.1 inch (6.29 out of 10), good enough for most feeder and match scenarios
Delphin INKS 2000X
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3+1) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Shimano AERO XR C5000X vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX


Shimano AERO XR C5000X vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X vs Daiwa 19 Certate 2500DX


Penn FIERCE IV 2500X vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X vs Shimano AERO XR C5000X


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X vs Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 6000X vs Daiwa 19 Certate 2500DX


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X vs Daiwa 19 Certate 2500DX


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X vs Daiwa TD Match 3012X


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CX


Penn FIERCE IV 2500X vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X


Daiwa 19 Certate 2500DX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX vs Penn FIERCE IV 2500X


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX vs Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD
