Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX vs Delphin MonoDRAG 2000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 24 TDR QD
Feeder And Match
84.40 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.94 out of 10
Gear ratio4.8:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight300g / 10.58oz
Line retireve per crank79 centimeter / 31.1 inch
Ball bearings8+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €229.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3012QD-DH
- Handle typeDouble handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150

Delphin MonoDRAG
Spinning
58.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.68 out of 10
Ergonomics6.18 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag-
Weight245g / 8.64oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings5+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €30.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/210
Conclusion
Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX clearly outshines Delphin MonoDRAG 2000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs) and line retrieve per crank (79 centimeter / 31.1 inch). While Delphin MonoDRAG 2000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 24 TDR QD and Delphin MonoDRAG?
Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX
- With a maximum drag of 10 out of 10 (12kg / 26,46lbs), this reel offers excellent stopping power, giving fishermen the confidence to handle pressure situations with ease
- This reel provides steady retrieval 79 centimeter / 31.1 inch (6.29 out of 10), good enough for most feeder and match scenarios
Delphin MonoDRAG 2000X
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (5+1) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Daiwa Freams LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX vs Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD


Daiwa TD FEEDER QD vs Shimano Stella FK 2500 S HGX


Mitchell 308 2000X vs Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500DX vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 3000X


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X vs Mitchell 308 PRO 2000X


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX


Shimano Vanquish FC 4000MHGCX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500DX


Daiwa TD FEEDER QD vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX vs Shimano Vanquish FC 4000MHGCX


Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD vs Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500DX


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X vs Daiwa Freams LT 3000D-CX


Shimano Vanquish FC 4000MHGCX vs Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI


Daiwa TD Match 3012X vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 3000X


Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500DX vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X vs Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD
