Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX vs Delphin MonoDRAG 2000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 24 TDR QD
Feeder And Match
84.40 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.94 out of 10
Gear ratio4.8:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight300g / 10.58oz
Line retireve per crank79 centimeter / 31.1 inch
Ball bearings8+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €229.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3012QD-DH
- Handle typeDouble handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150

Delphin MonoDRAG
Spinning
58.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.68 out of 10
Ergonomics6.18 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag-
Weight245g / 8.64oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings5+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €30.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/210
Conclusion
Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX clearly outshines Delphin MonoDRAG 2000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs) and line retrieve per crank (79 centimeter / 31.1 inch). While Delphin MonoDRAG 2000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 24 TDR QD and Delphin MonoDRAG?
Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX
- With a maximum drag of 10 out of 10 (12kg / 26,46lbs), this reel offers excellent stopping power, giving fishermen the confidence to handle pressure situations with ease
- This reel provides steady retrieval 79 centimeter / 31.1 inch (6.29 out of 10), good enough for most feeder and match scenarios
Delphin MonoDRAG 2000X
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (5+1) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2000-PX


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX vs Daiwa TD Match 4012X


Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X vs Delphin RAYA body


Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CXHX


Cormoran Sportline 2PiF vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2500 S-XHX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 2500-HX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX


Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 2500-HX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X vs Daiwa TD Match 4012X


Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF vs Daiwa TD Match 4012X


Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 4000-C / JB4 0.25MM YELLOW 4000-CX


Delphin REDIX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 2500-HX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2000-PX vs Daiwa TD Match 4012X


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX vs Delphin REDIX


Delphin RAYA body vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX


Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX vs Delphin REDIX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX vs Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD
