Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX vs Delphin MonoDRAG 4000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 24 TDR QD
Feeder And Match
84.40 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.94 out of 10
Gear ratio4.8:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight300g / 10.58oz
Line retireve per crank79 centimeter / 31.1 inch
Ball bearings8+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €229.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3012QD-DH
- Handle typeDouble handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150

Delphin MonoDRAG
Spinning
57.60 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.73 out of 10
Ergonomics6 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag-
Weight300g / 10.58oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings5+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €33.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.18/215
Conclusion
Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX clearly outshines Delphin MonoDRAG 4000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs) and line retrieve per crank (79 centimeter / 31.1 inch). While Delphin MonoDRAG 4000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 24 TDR QD and Delphin MonoDRAG?
Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX
- With a maximum drag of 10 out of 10 (12kg / 26,46lbs), this reel offers excellent stopping power, giving fishermen the confidence to handle pressure situations with ease
- This reel provides steady retrieval 79 centimeter / 31.1 inch (6.29 out of 10), good enough for most feeder and match scenarios
Delphin MonoDRAG 4000X
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (5+1) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano AERO XR C5000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500D-HX


Delphin REDIX vs Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX


Daiwa Nzon Distance 25 vs Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 4000D-CX


Daiwa TD FEEDER QD vs Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SHGX


Delphin FRIZ vs Shimano AERO XR C5000X


Shimano AERO XR C5000X vs Daiwa Nzon Distance 25


Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500D-HX


Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2000X


Shimano Ultegra C2500SHGDX vs Delphin REDIX


Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2000X


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500D-HX vs Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X


Daiwa Nzon Distance 25 vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 4000D-CX


Delphin REDIX vs Shimano AERO XR C5000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX vs Daiwa Nzon Distance 25


Shimano Ultegra C2500SHGDX vs Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SHGX


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX vs Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X
