Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX vs Shimano Complex XR C2000X

The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 24 TDR QD, 3012QD-DH, Match & Feeder Fishing Reel, Front Drag, 10516-313
Daiwa 24 TDR QD
Feeder And Match
84.40 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.94 out of 10
Gear ratio4.8:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight300g / 10.58oz
Line retireve per crank79 centimeter / 31.1 inch
Ball bearings8+1

Technical Specifications

  • BrandDAIWA
  • The main category of the reelFeeder and match
  • Price range~ €229.33
  • Is saltwater resistantNo
  • Spare spoolNo
  • Reel size3012QD-DH
  • Handle typeDouble handle
  • Drag typeFront drag
  • Handle orientationLeft, Right
  • Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Shimano Complex XR, C2000, left and right hand, Spinning fishing reel, Front Drag, 21CMXXRC2000F4
Shimano Complex XR
Spinning
77.60 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.48 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight155g / 5.47oz
Line retireve per crank69 centimeter / 27.17 inch
Ball bearings10

Technical Specifications

  • BrandSHIMANO
  • The main category of the reelSpinning
  • Price range~ €215.33
  • Is saltwater resistantNo
  • Spare spoolNo
  • Reel sizeC2000
  • Handle typeSingle handle
  • Drag typeFront drag
  • Handle orientationLeft, Right
  • Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.15/100

Conclusion

Both Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX and Shimano Complex XR C2000X perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX offers a maximum drag of 12kg / 26,46lbs, while Shimano Complex XR C2000X stands out for a weight of 155g / 5,47oz. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.

What's the difference between Daiwa 24 TDR QD and Shimano Complex XR?

Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX

  • This reel provides steady retrieval 79 centimeter / 31.1 inch (6.29 out of 10), good enough for most feeder and match scenarios