Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX vs Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 24 TDR QD
Feeder And Match
84.40 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.94 out of 10
Gear ratio4.8:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight300g / 10.58oz
Line retireve per crank79 centimeter / 31.1 inch
Ball bearings8+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €229.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3012QD-DH
- Handle typeDouble handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150

Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A
Multireels
79.60 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.89 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.1:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight1520g / 53.62oz
Line retireve per crank88 centimeter / 34.65 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €849.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size9000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/900
Conclusion
Both Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX and Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX offers a weight of 300g / 10,58oz, while Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A stands out for a line retrieve per crank of 88 centimeter / 34.65 inch. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa 24 TDR QD and Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A?
Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX
- The reel delivers balanced performance, suitable for most feeder and match situations without compromising too much on retrieve speed
- Rated 8.29 out of 10 (300g / 10,58oz) in weight, this reel strikes a great balance between sturdiness and lightness, making it great for consistent feeder casting
Similar comparisons

Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX vs Shimano Cardiff 301A


Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X vs Shimano Tiagra 50AX


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus Distance 25 QD vs Shimano Cardiff 301A


Shimano Cardiff 301A vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X vs Shimano AERO XR C3000X


Shimano Cardiff 301A vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX


Shimano Cardiff 301A vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX


Shimano AERO XR C3000X vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX vs Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX


Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS vs Shimano Torium 16HGAL / Left-handedX


Shimano Cardiff 301A vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX


Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX vs Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX vs Shimano Torium 16HGAL / Left-handedX


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX
