Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX vs Daiwa Tanacom 500

The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 24 TDR QD

Feeder And Match

84.60 out of 100

Value for money4.5 out of 5

Quality classExcellent

Durability5.5 out of 10

Ergonomics5.99 out of 10

Gear ratio4.8:1

Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs

Weight285g / 10.05oz

Line retireve per crank79 centimeter / 31.1 inch

Ball bearings8+1

Technical Specifications

BrandDAIWA
The main category of the reelFeeder and match
Price range~ €229.33
Is saltwater resistantNo
Spare spoolNo
Reel size3012QD
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150

Daiwa Tanacom 500

Multireels

70.40 out of 100

Value for money4 out of 5

Quality classExcellent

Durability9.5 out of 10

Ergonomics3.8 out of 10

Gear ratio2.8:1

Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs

Weight750g / 26.46oz

Line retireve per crank46 centimeter / 18.11 inch

Ball bearings3

Technical Specifications

BrandDAIWA
The main category of the reelMultireels
Price range~ €489.33
Is saltwater resistantYes
Spare spoolNo
Reel size-
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeStar drag
Handle orientationRight
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/420

Conclusion

Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX edges out Daiwa Tanacom 500 with slightly better overall performance, especially on the weight (285g / 10,05oz) and the maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs). Still, Daiwa Tanacom 500 holds its own with strengths like a durability of 9.5 out of 10, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.

What's the difference between Daiwa 24 TDR QD and Daiwa Tanacom 500?

Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX

The reel delivers balanced performance, suitable for most feeder and match situations without compromising too much on retrieve speed
Rated 8.37 out of 10 (285g / 10,05oz) in weight, this reel strikes a great balance between sturdiness and lightness, making it great for consistent feeder casting
This reel provides steady retrieval 79 centimeter / 31.1 inch (6.29 out of 10), good enough for most feeder and match scenarios