Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX vs Delphin INKS 2000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 24 TDR QD
Feeder And Match
84.60 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.99 out of 10
Gear ratio4.8:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight285g / 10.05oz
Line retireve per crank79 centimeter / 31.1 inch
Ball bearings8+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €229.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3012QD
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150

Delphin INKS
Spinning
54.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.53 out of 10
Ergonomics6.17 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag-
Weight250g / 8.82oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €21.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/400
Conclusion
Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX clearly outshines Delphin INKS 2000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs) and line retrieve per crank (79 centimeter / 31.1 inch). While Delphin INKS 2000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 24 TDR QD and Delphin INKS?
Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX
- With a maximum drag of 10 out of 10 (12kg / 26,46lbs), this reel offers excellent stopping power, giving fishermen the confidence to handle pressure situations with ease
- This reel provides steady retrieval 79 centimeter / 31.1 inch (6.29 out of 10), good enough for most feeder and match scenarios
Delphin INKS 2000X
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3+1) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Shimano AERO XR 4000X vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX vs Shimano AERO XR C5000X


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus Distance 25 QD vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX vs Daiwa BG 4000X


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus Distance 25 QD vs Delphin REDIX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X


Shimano Aero C3000X vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus Distance 25 QD vs Shimano FX 1000 FCX


Daiwa BG 4000X vs Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX


Daiwa BG 4000X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2000X


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX vs Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX


Shimano AERO XR C5000X vs Shimano Vanford FA 2500AX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Shimano AERO XR C5000X


Shimano Aero C3000X vs Shimano FX 1000 FCX


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X vs Daiwa BG 4000X


Shimano Aero C3000X vs Delphin RAYA body


Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX vs Delphin REDIX


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX vs Shimano FX 1000 FCX


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2000X


Shimano AERO XR C5000X vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X
