Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX vs Delphin IXPERA 2000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 24 TDR QD
Feeder And Match
84.60 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.99 out of 10
Gear ratio4.8:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight285g / 10.05oz
Line retireve per crank79 centimeter / 31.1 inch
Ball bearings8+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €229.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3012QD
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150

Delphin IXPERA
Spinning
2000x
61.60 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.87 out of 10
Ergonomics6.22 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag-
Weight235g / 8.29oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings5+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €41.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.12/400
Conclusion
Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX clearly outshines Delphin IXPERA 2000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs) and line retrieve per crank (79 centimeter / 31.1 inch). While Delphin IXPERA 2000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 24 TDR QD and Delphin IXPERA?
Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX
- With a maximum drag of 10 out of 10 (12kg / 26,46lbs), this reel offers excellent stopping power, giving fishermen the confidence to handle pressure situations with ease
- This reel provides steady retrieval 79 centimeter / 31.1 inch (6.29 out of 10), good enough for most feeder and match scenarios
Delphin IXPERA 2000X
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (5+1) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX vs Penn FIERCE IV 3000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX


Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500SX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500SX vs Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X


Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X vs Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X vs Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X


Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX vs Daiwa TD Match 4012X


Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X


Daiwa TD Match 4012X vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX


Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX vs Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500SX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus Distance 25 QD vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX


Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD vs Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500SX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500SX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX
