Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX vs Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 24 TDR QD
Feeder And Match
84.60 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.99 out of 10
Gear ratio4.8:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight285g / 10.05oz
Line retireve per crank79 centimeter / 31.1 inch
Ball bearings8+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €229.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3012QD
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150

Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG
Spinning
48.20 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.72 out of 10
Ergonomics6.05 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight284g / 10.02oz
Line retireve per crank0 inch
Ball bearings5+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €32.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/210
Conclusion
Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX clearly outshines Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs) and line retrieve per crank (79 centimeter / 31.1 inch). While Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 24 TDR QD and Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG?
Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX
- With a maximum drag of 10 out of 10 (12kg / 26,46lbs), this reel offers excellent stopping power, giving fishermen the confidence to handle pressure situations with ease
- This reel provides steady retrieval 79 centimeter / 31.1 inch (6.29 out of 10), good enough for most feeder and match scenarios
Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (5+1) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX vs Shimano Exsence 4000 MXGAX


Delphin INKS 4000X vs Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD


Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X


Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX


Shimano AERO XR 4000X vs Delphin INKS 4000X


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2500X vs Daiwa TD FEEDER QD


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2500X


Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI vs Shimano Exsence 4000 MXGAX


Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD vs Shimano Exsence 4000 MXGAX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano AERO XR 4000X


Shimano AERO XR 4000X vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2500X


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX vs Delphin INKS 4000X


Daiwa TD FEEDER QD vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX vs Delphin INKS 4000X


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2000DX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX


Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 5000D-C 5000D-CX


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 5000D-C 5000D-CX


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX vs Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X
