Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 1000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 24 TDR QD
Feeder And Match
84.60 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.99 out of 10
Gear ratio4.8:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight285g / 10.05oz
Line retireve per crank79 centimeter / 31.1 inch
Ball bearings8+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €229.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3012QD
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150

Shimano 21 Nexave FI
Spinning
50.20 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.82 out of 10
Ergonomics6.27 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag-
Weight220g / 7.76oz
Line retireve per crank66 centimeter / 25.98 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €39.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/140
Conclusion
Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX clearly outshines Shimano 21 Nexave FI 1000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs) and total score (8.46 out of 10). While Shimano 21 Nexave FI 1000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 24 TDR QD and Shimano 21 Nexave FI?
Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX
- With a maximum drag of 10 out of 10 (12kg / 26,46lbs), this reel offers excellent stopping power, giving fishermen the confidence to handle pressure situations with ease
- This reel provides steady retrieval 79 centimeter / 31.1 inch (6.29 out of 10), good enough for most feeder and match scenarios
Shimano 21 Nexave FI 1000X
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (4) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Mitchell 300 4000X vs Shimano AERO XR C3000X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500(U)X vs Shimano Stella FK C 3000 XGX


Daiwa TD Match 3012X vs Shimano Stella FK C 3000 XGX


Shimano Vanquish FC 4000MHGCX vs Shimano Complex XR C2000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX vs Shimano AERO XR 4000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX vs Shimano Super 2500 GT RD Spinning reel with fighting drag


Mitchell 300 4000X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX


Shimano AERO XR C5000X vs Shimano AERO XR 4000X


Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD vs Shimano Super 2500 GT RD Spinning reel with fighting drag


Shimano Ultegra C2000SHGDX vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX


Shimano AERO XR 4000X vs Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD


Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD vs Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD


Shimano Stella FK C 3000 XGX vs Shimano Complex XR 2500 HGX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Ultegra C2000SHGDX


Shimano Super 2500 GT RD Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Daiwa TD Match 3012X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500(U)X vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X


Shimano Complex XR C2000X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX


Shimano Super 2500 GT RD Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX


Daiwa TD Match 3012X vs Shimano AERO XR C5000X
