Daiwa BG MQ 10000-HX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa BG MQ
Seafishing
60.30 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.66 out of 10
Ergonomics5.49 out of 10
Gear ratio5.7:1
Maximum drag15kg / 33.07lbs
Weight640g / 22.58oz
Line retireve per crank117 centimeter / 46.06 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSeafishing
- Price range~ €199.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size10000-H
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/300

Shimano Sahara FJ
Spinning
78.00 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.07 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight280g / 9.88oz
Line retireve per crank99 centimeter / 38.98 inch
Ball bearings4+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €71.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 XG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/180
Conclusion
Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX edges out Daiwa BG MQ 10000-HX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the gear ratio (6.2:1) and the line retrieve per crank (99 centimeter / 38.98 inch). Still, Daiwa BG MQ 10000-HX holds its own with strengths like a ball bearings of 6 and a weight of 640g / 22,58oz, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa BG MQ and Shimano Sahara FJ?
Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX
- A fast gear ratio of 10 out of 10 (6.2:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- A high retrieve rate of 9.4 out of 10 (99 centimeter / 38.98 inch), means the reel is made just for speed, perfect for speed fishing or covering water quickly
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Sedona FJ 4000XGFJX vs Daiwa Emblem Surf 45 SCW Type R


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX vs Shimano Stradic SWB 8000HGX


Shimano Sedona FJ 4000XGFJX vs Daiwa 20 Saltiga (G) 10000-PX


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2500X vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX


Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX vs Penn 2020 Clash II 2000X


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX vs Shimano 21 Stradic SW 5000 XGX


Daiwa Emblem Surf 45 SCW Type R vs Daiwa Regal LT 2500 DX


Daiwa Regal LT 2500 DX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2500X vs Penn 2020 Clash II 2000X


Daiwa 20 Saltiga (G) 10000-PX vs Daiwa BG MQ 8000-HX


Daiwa Regal LT 2500 DX vs Daiwa 21 Certate SW (G) 5000-HX


Delphin SHARX 6000X vs Shimano Sedona FJ 4000XGFJX


Daiwa 21 Certate SW (G) 5000-HX vs Shimano Stradic SWB 8000HGX


Daiwa 21 Certate SW (G) 5000-HX vs Shimano 21 Stradic SW 5000 XGX


Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 14000 XGX vs Penn 2020 Clash II 2000X


Delphin SHARX 6000X vs Shimano Catana 2500 RC


Shimano Sedona FJ 4000XGFJX vs Shimano Spheros SW A 18000 HGX


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2500X vs Shimano Sedona FJ 4000XGFJX


Shimano Catana 2500 RC vs Shimano Spheros SW A 18000 HGX


Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX vs Shimano Catana 2500 RC
