Daiwa BG MQ 20000X vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa BG MQ
Seafishing
55.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.71 out of 10
Ergonomics3.4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag20kg / 44.09lbs
Weight860g / 30.34oz
Line retireve per crank134 centimeter / 52.76 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSeafishing
- Price range~ €214.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size20000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.52/300

Shimano Sahara FJ
Spinning
70.00 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight305g / 10.76oz
Line retireve per crank105 centimeter / 41.34 inch
Ball bearings4+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €74.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC 5000 XG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.35/175
Conclusion
Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX edges out Daiwa BG MQ 20000X with slightly better overall performance, especially on the gear ratio (6.2:1) and the line retrieve per crank (105 centimeter / 41.34 inch). Still, Daiwa BG MQ 20000X holds its own with strengths like a ball bearings of 6 and a maximum drag of 20kg / 44,09lbs, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa BG MQ and Shimano Sahara FJ?
Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX
- A fast gear ratio of 10 out of 10 (6.2:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- A high retrieve rate of 10 out of 10 (105 centimeter / 41.34 inch), means the reel is made just for speed, perfect for speed fishing or covering water quickly
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Penn FIERCE IV 2000X vs Daiwa 21 Certate SW 10000-PX


Daiwa 21 Certate SW 10000-PX vs Shimano 2020 Saragosa SW A 14000 XGX


Shimano 20 Stella 4000 HGX vs Daiwa 21 Certate SW (G) 5000-XHX


Daiwa 23 Caldia SW 4000D-CXHX vs Penn FIERCE IV 2000X


Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 5000 XGX vs Shimano 2020 Saragosa SW A 14000 XGX


Shimano Vanquish FC C5000XGCX vs Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 10000 PGX


Daiwa 21 Certate SW (G) 5000-XHX vs Penn FIERCE IV 2000X


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa BG MQ 20000X


Daiwa BG MQ 20000X vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX


Shimano 20 Stella 4000 HGX vs Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 10000 PGX


Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 10000 PGX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX


Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 10000 PGX vs Daiwa 21 Certate SW (G) 5000-XHX


Daiwa BG MQ 20000X vs Daiwa 21 Certate SW 10000-PX


Daiwa 21 Presso LT 1000 S-PX vs Shimano Spheros SW SP3000XGSWX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 5000-C(U)X vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX


Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 5000 XGX vs Shimano Spheros SW SP3000XGSWX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 5000-C(U)X vs Daiwa 21 Presso LT 1000 S-PX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX vs Shimano 20 Stella 4000 HGX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX vs Penn FIERCE IV 2000X


Shimano 20 Stella 4000 HGX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 5000D-CXHX
