Daiwa BG MQ 2500-HX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa BG MQ
Seafishing
56.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability4 out of 10
Ergonomics6.06 out of 10
Gear ratio5.7:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight235g / 8.29oz
Line retireve per crank80 centimeter / 31.5 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSeafishing
- Price range~ €149.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500-H
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150

Abu GARCIA Zenon
Spinning
83.30 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.47 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag5.2kg / 11,46lbs
Weight160g / 5.64oz
Line retireve per crank96 centimeter / 37.8 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandABU GARCIA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €326.00
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 SH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.33/150
Conclusion
Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX clearly outshines Daiwa BG MQ 2500-HX, offering significantly better performance in gear ratio (6.2:1) and durability (9.5 out of 10). While Daiwa BG MQ 2500-HX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa BG MQ and Abu GARCIA Zenon?
Daiwa BG MQ 2500-HX
- At 5 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the drag is on the lighter side—suitable for smaller saltwater species or finesse-style presentations
- Scoring 8.5 out of 10 (6), the reel runs smooth under pressure
Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX
- A fast gear ratio of 10 out of 10 (6.2:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa BG MQ 20000X vs Shimano 21 Stradic SW 8000 HGX


Shimano 2020 Saragosa SW A 5000 XGX vs Shimano Ultegra C2000SHGDX


Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 8000 HGX vs Daiwa 21 Certate SW (G) 5000-HX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000-XHX vs Shimano TLD 15X


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MFEX vs Shimano Ultegra C2000SHGDX


Shimano 2020 Saragosa SW A 5000 XGX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000-XHX


Daiwa 21 Certate SW (G) 5000-HX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX


Shimano Spheros SW A 14000 XGX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX


Shimano 21 Stradic SW 5000 XGX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX


Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 8000 HGX vs Shimano Spheros SW A 14000 XGX


Shimano Spheros SW A 14000 XGX vs Shimano Ultegra C2000SHGDX


Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 8000 HGX vs Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 10000 PGX


Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SHGX vs Shimano 2020 Saragosa SW A 5000 XGX


Shimano 21 Stradic SW 6000 XGX vs Shimano TLD 15X


Shimano 2020 Saragosa SW A 5000 XGX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX


Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 10000 PGX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000-HX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000-HX vs Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 8000 HGX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 1000X


Shimano TLD 15X vs Shimano Spheros SW A 14000 XGX
