Daiwa BG MQ 2500-HX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa BG MQ
Seafishing
56.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability4 out of 10
Ergonomics6.06 out of 10
Gear ratio5.7:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight235g / 8.29oz
Line retireve per crank80 centimeter / 31.5 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSeafishing
- Price range~ €149.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500-H
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150

Daiwa 22 Exist LT
Spinning
84.40 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.5 out of 10
Gear ratio4.9:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight150g / 5.29oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €635.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000D-P
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX clearly outshines Daiwa BG MQ 2500-HX, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and gear ratio (4.9:1). While Daiwa BG MQ 2500-HX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa BG MQ and Daiwa 22 Exist LT?
Daiwa BG MQ 2500-HX
- A line retrieval (per crank) of 80 centimeter / 31.5 inch helps bringing in line quickly, making it great for repositioning or working topwater baits
- Scoring 8.5 out of 10 (6), the reel runs smooth under pressure
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX
- The 5.67 out of 10 (4.9:1) gear ratio gives you the power you need to handle heavy lures and strong large fish out of cover
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano TLD 25X vs Daiwa Ninja LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 4000D-CXH 4000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 24 Certate SW 6000-XHX


Daiwa Ninja LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CPX


Daiwa Ninja LT 4000-CX vs Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 10000 HGX


Shimano Catana FE 2500 HGX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CPX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CPX vs Shimano Beastmaster 12000 MD


Shimano Complex XR 2500X vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 4000D-CXH 4000D-CXHX


Shimano Catana FE 2500 HGX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 5000-CX


Daiwa Crossfire LT 4000-CX vs Shimano TLD 25X


Daiwa Crossfire LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Beastmaster 12000 MD


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CPX vs Shimano Spheros SW A 18000 HGX


Daiwa RX LT 2000X vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 4000D-CXH 4000D-CXHX


Daiwa 24 Certate SW 6000-XHX vs Shimano 21 Stradic SW 6000 PGX


Daiwa Crossfire LT 4000-CX vs Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 5000 HGX


Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 5000 HGX vs Shimano Spheros SW A 5000 XGX


Shimano TLD 25X vs Daiwa RX LT 2000X


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 5000-CX vs Shimano Spheros SW A 5000 XGX


Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 5000 HGX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 5000-CX vs Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 10000 HGX


Daiwa 24 Certate SW 6000-XHX vs Daiwa RX LT 2000X
