Daiwa BG MQ 2500-HX vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 1000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa BG MQ
Seafishing
56.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability4 out of 10
Ergonomics6.06 out of 10
Gear ratio5.7:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight235g / 8.29oz
Line retireve per crank80 centimeter / 31.5 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSeafishing
- Price range~ €149.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500-H
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150

Delphin ANTIGRAVITY
Spinning
47.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.68 out of 10
Ergonomics6.47 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight159g / 5.61oz
Line retireve per crank0 inch
Ball bearings10+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €85.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.1/270
Conclusion
Daiwa BG MQ 2500-HX clearly outshines Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 1000X, offering significantly better performance in line retrieve per crank (80 centimeter / 31.5 inch) and ball bearings (6). While Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 1000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa BG MQ 2500-HX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa BG MQ and Delphin ANTIGRAVITY?
Daiwa BG MQ 2500-HX
- At 5 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the drag is on the lighter side—suitable for smaller saltwater species or finesse-style presentations
- A line retrieval (per crank) of 80 centimeter / 31.5 inch helps bringing in line quickly, making it great for repositioning or working topwater baits
- Scoring 8.5 out of 10 (6), the reel runs smooth under pressure
Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 1000X
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 4000-CX vs Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 6000 HGX


Shimano 21 Stradic SW 5000 PGX vs Daiwa 21 Certate SW 10000-PX


Daiwa 20 Saltiga (G) 18000-HX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX


Daiwa 23 Saltiga 5000-HX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CXHX vs Shimano 21 Stradic SW 10000 HGX


Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI vs Shimano Catana FE C 3000X


Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI vs Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 5000 XGX


Daiwa Ninja LT 2500DX vs Shimano Stradic SWB 6000HGX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT1000X vs Daiwa 23 Saltiga 5000-HX


Daiwa Ninja LT 2500DX vs Mitchell 308 PRO 2000X


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX vs Shimano 21 Stradic SW 6000 XGX


Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 6000 HGX vs Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 5000 XGX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2000-PX vs Daiwa 23 Saltiga 5000-HX


Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 5000 XGX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CXHX


Shimano 21 Stradic SW 5000 PGX vs Daiwa 23 Saltiga 5000-HX


Shimano 21 Stradic SW 10000 HGX vs Shimano 21 Stradic SW 6000 XGX


Daiwa Ninja LT 2500DX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 23 Saltiga 5000-HX


Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI vs Shimano 21 Stradic SW 10000 HGX
