Daiwa BG MQ 2500-HX vs Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX

The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa BG MQ

Seafishing

56.60 out of 100

Value for money4 out of 5

Quality classMedium

Durability4 out of 10

Ergonomics6.06 out of 10

Gear ratio5.7:1

Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs

Weight235g / 8.29oz

Line retireve per crank80 centimeter / 31.5 inch

Ball bearings6

Technical Specifications

BrandDAIWA
The main category of the reelSeafishing
Price range~ €149.33
Is saltwater resistantNo
Spare spoolNo
Reel size2500-H
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150

Shimano Sedona FJ

Spinning

63.90 out of 100

Value for money3 out of 5

Quality classLow

Durability7 out of 10

Ergonomics6.18 out of 10

Gear ratio5.0:1

Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs

Weight245g / 8.64oz

Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch

Ball bearings3+1

Technical Specifications

BrandSHIMANO
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €52.33
Is saltwater resistantYes
Spare spoolNo
Reel sizeC3000FJ
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/130

Conclusion

Both Daiwa BG MQ 2500-HX and Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa BG MQ 2500-HX offers a line retrieve per crank of 80 centimeter / 31.5 inch, while Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX stands out for a gear ratio of 5.0:1. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.

What's the difference between Daiwa BG MQ and Shimano Sedona FJ?

Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX

Thanks to its 6.33 out of 10 (5.0:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.