Daiwa BG MQ 3000D-XHX vs Delphin ELIXIR 3000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa BG MQ
Seafishing
56.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability4 out of 10
Ergonomics6.02 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight265g / 9.35oz
Line retireve per crank83 centimeter / 32.68 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSeafishing
- Price range~ €149.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000D-XH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.33/150

Delphin ELIXIR
Spinning
53.30 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.19 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag-
Weight244g / 8.61oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €18.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/350
Conclusion
Both Daiwa BG MQ 3000D-XHX and Delphin ELIXIR 3000X perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa BG MQ 3000D-XHX offers a line retrieve per crank of 83 centimeter / 32.68 inch, while Delphin ELIXIR 3000X stands out for a gear ratio of 5.0:1. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa BG MQ and Delphin ELIXIR?
Daiwa BG MQ 3000D-XHX
- At 5 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the drag is on the lighter side—suitable for smaller saltwater species or finesse-style presentations
- A line retrieval (per crank) of 83 centimeter / 32.68 inch helps bringing in line quickly, making it great for repositioning or working topwater baits
Delphin ELIXIR 3000X
- Thanks to its 6.33 out of 10 (5.0:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
Similar comparisons

Shimano TLD 15X vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CXHX


Delphin SHARX 4000X vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500(U)X


Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 5000 HGX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CX


Delphin SHARX 4000X vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano 2020 Saragosa SW A 10000 PGX vs Delphin SHARX 4000X


Shimano 21 Stradic SW 8000 PGX vs Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SHGX


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Spheros SW A 14000 XGX


Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 5000 XGX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X


Shimano 21 Stradic SW 8000 PGX vs Delphin SHARX 4000X


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CX vs Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 5000 XGX


Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 5000 HGX vs Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 5000 XGX


Daiwa 21 Certate SW 10000-PX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500(U)X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X


Delphin SHARX 4000X vs Shimano 2020 Saragosa SW A 10000 PGX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CX


Shimano Vanford FA C2500SAX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2500X


Daiwa 21 Certate SW 10000-PX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2500X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500(U)X vs Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 8000 HGX


Shimano TLD 15X vs Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 8000 HGX


Delphin SHARX 4000X vs Shimano Spheros SW SP4000XGSWX
