Daiwa BG MQ 3000D-XHX vs Delphin SHARX 3000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa BG MQ
Seafishing
56.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability4 out of 10
Ergonomics6.02 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight265g / 9.35oz
Line retireve per crank83 centimeter / 32.68 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSeafishing
- Price range~ €149.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000D-XH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.33/150

Delphin SHARX
Spinning
55.40 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.2 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag-
Weight239g / 8.43oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings9+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €69.95
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/390
Conclusion
Both Daiwa BG MQ 3000D-XHX and Delphin SHARX 3000X perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa BG MQ 3000D-XHX offers a line retrieve per crank of 83 centimeter / 32.68 inch, while Delphin SHARX 3000X stands out for a gear ratio of 5.2:1. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa BG MQ and Delphin SHARX?
Daiwa BG MQ 3000D-XHX
- At 5 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the drag is on the lighter side—suitable for smaller saltwater species or finesse-style presentations
- A line retrieval (per crank) of 83 centimeter / 32.68 inch helps bringing in line quickly, making it great for repositioning or working topwater baits
- Scoring 8.5 out of 10 (6), the reel runs smooth under pressure
Delphin SHARX 3000X
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa Crosscast Surf 35 SCW QD Type R


Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 8000 HGX vs Daiwa 20 Saltiga (G) 20000-HX


Daiwa 20 Saltiga (G) 20000-HX vs Shimano Catana 1000 RC


Abu GARCIA Zenon 1000 SX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CX


Shimano Vanford FA C3000SDHAX vs Shimano Stella FK 1000X


Shimano 2020 Saragosa SW A 20000 PGX vs Shimano Catana 1000 RC


Shimano Stella FK 1000X vs Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 8000 HGX


Daiwa 21 Certate SW 10000-PX vs Daiwa Regal LT 2500 DX


Abu GARCIA Zenon 1000 SX vs Daiwa 20 Saltiga (G) 20000-HX


Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 8000 HGX vs Shimano 2020 Saragosa SW A 5000 XGX


Shimano Catana 1000 RC vs Shimano 2020 Saragosa SW A 20000 PGX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2000X vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 1000 SX


Shimano Stella FK 1000X vs Daiwa RX LT 1000X


Daiwa BG MQ 4000D-XHX vs Shimano Catana 1000 RC


Shimano Stella FK 1000X vs Daiwa 20 Saltiga (G) 20000-HX


Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 8000 PGX vs Shimano Catana 1000 RC


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2000X vs Shimano Stradic SWB 6000XGX


Daiwa RX LT 1000X vs Daiwa 20 Saltiga (G) 8000-HX


Daiwa Crosscast Surf 35 SCW QD Type R vs Shimano 19 Stella 8000 HGX


Shimano Catana 1000 RC vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000SDHAX
