Daiwa BG MQ 3000D-XHX vs Penn Battle III 8000 HSX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa BG MQ
Seafishing
56.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability4 out of 10
Ergonomics6.02 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight265g / 9.35oz
Line retireve per crank83 centimeter / 32.68 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSeafishing
- Price range~ €149.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000D-XH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.33/150

Penn Battle III
Spinning
69.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag13.6kg / 29,98lbs
Weight785g / 27.7oz
Line retireve per crank112 centimeter / 44.09 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €127.60
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size8000 HS
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.46/335
Conclusion
Penn Battle III 8000 HSX edges out Daiwa BG MQ 3000D-XHX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the gear ratio (5.3:1) and the durability (8.5 out of 10). Still, Daiwa BG MQ 3000D-XHX holds its own with strengths like a line retrieve per crank of 83 centimeter / 32.68 inch and a weight of 265g / 9,35oz, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa BG MQ and Penn Battle III?
Daiwa BG MQ 3000D-XHX
- With a weight score of 9.24 out of 10 (265g / 9,35oz), this reel is impressively light for saltwater and provides great comfort
- A line retrieval (per crank) of 83 centimeter / 32.68 inch helps bringing in line quickly, making it great for repositioning or working topwater baits
Penn Battle III 8000 HSX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8.2 out of 10 (5.3:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Stradic SWB 6000HGX vs Shimano 20 Stella 6000 PGX


Daiwa 24 Certate SW 5000-HX vs Daiwa RX LT 2500X


Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 6000 HGX vs Shimano Stradic SWB 5000XGX


Shimano Stradic SWB 5000XGX vs Shimano Vanford FA 2500SHGAX


Shimano Stradic SWB 5000XGX vs Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 5000 XGX


Shimano Stradic SWB 6000HGX vs Shimano 21 Stradic SW 6000 XGX


Shimano Vanford FA 2500SHGAX vs Daiwa 21 Certate SW 8000-PX


Shimano Stradic SWB 5000XGX vs Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 6000 HGX


Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX vs Shimano Vanford FA 2500SHGAX


Shimano 20 Stella 6000 PGX vs Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 6000 HGX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Stradic SWB 5000XGX


Daiwa 23 Saltiga 6000-HX vs Shimano 21 TwinPower SW 6000X


Daiwa RX LT 2500X vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500X


Daiwa 24 Certate SW 5000-HX vs Daiwa Emblem Surf 45 SCW Type R


Daiwa 23 Saltiga 6000-HX vs Shimano Stradic SWB 6000HGX


Shimano Stradic SWB 6000HGX vs Shimano Vanford FA 2500SHGAX


Daiwa RX LT 2500X vs Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 6000 HGX


Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 6000 HGX vs Daiwa 21 Certate SW 8000-PX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2000-PX vs Mitchell 300 4000X


Daiwa 24 Certate SW 5000-HX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX
