Daiwa BG MQ 6000D-HX vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa BG MQ
Seafishing
56.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.56 out of 10
Ergonomics5.79 out of 10
Gear ratio5.7:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight430g / 15.17oz
Line retireve per crank101 centimeter / 39.76 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSeafishing
- Price range~ €169.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size6000D-H
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.43/150

Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF
Spinning
38.20 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.54 out of 10
Ergonomics6.18 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag2.5kg / 5.51lbs
Weight245g / 8.64oz
Line retireve per crank74 centimeter / 29.13 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandCORMORAN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €22.60
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/250
Conclusion
Daiwa BG MQ 6000D-HX clearly outshines Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs) and total score (5.66 out of 10). While Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa BG MQ 6000D-HX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa BG MQ and Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF?
Daiwa BG MQ 6000D-HX
- At 5.82 out of 10 (12kg / 26,46lbs), the drag is on the lighter side—suitable for smaller saltwater species or finesse-style presentations
Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.57 out of 10 (74 centimeter / 29.13 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
Similar comparisons

Shimano Twin Power FD C3000XGX vs Shimano TLD 15X


Shimano Sedona FJ 4000FJX vs Shimano TLD 20X


Shimano Catana FE 4000 HGX vs Shimano Vanquish FC C3000XGCX


Daiwa 23 Caldia SW 4000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 24 Certate SW 6000-HX


Daiwa 24 Certate SW 4000-XHX vs Shimano Vanquish FC C3000XGCX


Daiwa 24 Certate SW 4000-XHX vs Shimano Catana FE 4000 HGX


Shimano Catana FE 4000 HGX vs Shimano Twin Power FD C3000XGX


Shimano Sahara 2500 R vs Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 HGX


Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 8000 PGX vs Shimano Sahara 2500 R


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX vs Daiwa 24 Certate SW 4000-XHX


Shimano Spheros SW A 5000 XGX vs Daiwa 20 Saltiga (G) 18000-HX


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2000S-XHX


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X vs Shimano Spheros SW A 5000 XGX


Shimano Vanquish FC C5000XGCX vs Daiwa 20 Saltiga (G) 18000-HX


Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 8000 PGX vs Shimano Twin Power FD C3000XGX


Shimano Vanquish FC C5000XGCX vs Daiwa 21 Certate SW (G) 5000-HX


Daiwa 24 Certate SW 4000-XHX vs Daiwa 23 Caldia SW 4000D-CXHX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX vs Shimano Vanquish FC C5000XGCX


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X vs Shimano TLD 15X


Shimano TLD 20X vs Daiwa 24 Certate SW 4000-XHX
