Daiwa BG MQ 6000D-HX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa BG MQ
Seafishing
56.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.56 out of 10
Ergonomics5.79 out of 10
Gear ratio5.7:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight430g / 15.17oz
Line retireve per crank101 centimeter / 39.76 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSeafishing
- Price range~ €169.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size6000D-H
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.43/150

Daiwa 22 Exist LT
Spinning
88.70 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.47 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight160g / 5.64oz
Line retireve per crank72 centimeter / 28.35 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €668.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X clearly outshines Daiwa BG MQ 6000D-HX, offering significantly better performance in gear ratio (5.1:1) and durability (9.5 out of 10). While Daiwa BG MQ 6000D-HX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa BG MQ and Daiwa 22 Exist LT?
Daiwa BG MQ 6000D-HX
- Scoring 8.5 out of 10 (6), the reel runs smooth under pressure
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.29 out of 10 (72 centimeter / 28.35 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 6000 HGX vs Daiwa 21 Certate SW (G) 5000-XHX


Shimano Vanford FA C3000AX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 1000DX


Daiwa 21 Certate SW (G) 5000-XHX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 1000DX


Shimano 2020 Saragosa SW A 20000 PGX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 1000DX


Daiwa 21 Certate SW (G) 5000-XHX vs Daiwa 23 Saltiga 5000-HX


Daiwa BG MQ 10000-HX vs Shimano Spheros SW A 8000 HGX


Daiwa BG MQ 10000-HX vs Shimano 2020 Saragosa SW A 20000 PGX


Shimano Vanford FA C3000AX vs Delphin INKS 3000X


Daiwa 23 Saltiga 5000-HX vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 4000X


Daiwa BG 4500X vs Daiwa 24 Certate SW 6000-XHX


Shimano Sahara 2500 R vs Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X


Daiwa 20 Saltiga (G) 8000-HX vs Shimano 2020 Saragosa SW A 20000 PGX


Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 6000 HGX vs Shimano 2020 Saragosa SW A 20000 PGX


Shimano 2020 Saragosa SW A 20000 PGX vs Shimano Spheros SW A 8000 HGX


Shimano Spheros SW A 8000 HGX vs Daiwa RX LT 2500X


Daiwa 23 Caldia SW 4000D-CXHX vs Daiwa RX LT 2500X


Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 6000 HGX vs Shimano Spheros SW A 8000 HGX


Delphin INKS 3000X vs Shimano Sienna 2500X


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 4000X vs Daiwa 21 Certate SW (G) 5000-XHX


Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X vs Shimano Sienna 2500X
