Daiwa BG MQ 6000D-HX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000-HX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa BG MQ
Seafishing
56.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.56 out of 10
Ergonomics5.79 out of 10
Gear ratio5.7:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight430g / 15.17oz
Line retireve per crank101 centimeter / 39.76 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSeafishing
- Price range~ €169.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size6000D-H
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.43/150

Daiwa 22 Exist LT
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.7:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank85 centimeter
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €673.66
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000-H
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000-HX clearly outshines Daiwa BG MQ 6000D-HX, offering significantly better performance in gear ratio (5.7:1) and line retrieve per crank (85 centimeter). While Daiwa BG MQ 6000D-HX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000-HX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa BG MQ and Daiwa 22 Exist LT?
Daiwa BG MQ 6000D-HX
- Scoring 8.5 out of 10 (6), the reel runs smooth under pressure
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000-HX
- A fast gear ratio of 9 out of 10 (5.7:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- 8 out of 10 (85 centimeter) in line retrieve, means it picks up line fast, very handy when chasing quick fish
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 20 Saltiga (G) 14000-XHX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX


Daiwa 20 Saltiga (G) 14000-XHX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X


Daiwa 20 Saltiga (G) 10000-PX vs Shimano 2020 Saragosa SW A 6000 HGX


Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X vs Daiwa 20 Saltiga (G) 14000-XHX


Daiwa RX LT 2000X vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 5000D-CX


Shimano 2020 Saragosa SW A 6000 HGX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X


Daiwa 24 Certate SW 5000-XHX vs Daiwa 20 Saltiga (G) 14000-PX


Shimano 2020 Saragosa SW A 6000 HGX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 5000D-CX


Daiwa 20 Saltiga (G) 14000-PX vs Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 4000 XGX


Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X


Daiwa 20 Saltiga (G) 14000-XHX vs Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 14000 XGX


Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 4000 XGX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX


Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 1000X


Daiwa 20 Saltiga (G) 20000-HX vs Daiwa 20 Saltiga (G) 14000-PX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 1000X vs Daiwa 20 Saltiga (G) 20000-HX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX vs Daiwa 20 Saltiga (G) 10000-PX


Daiwa 20 Saltiga (G) 20000-HX vs Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X


Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X vs Daiwa 24 Certate SW 5000-XHX


Daiwa 24 Certate SW 5000-XHX vs Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 14000 XGX


Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX
