Daiwa BG MQ 6000D-HX vs Penn FIERCE IV 2500X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa BG MQ
Seafishing
56.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.56 out of 10
Ergonomics5.79 out of 10
Gear ratio5.7:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight430g / 15.17oz
Line retireve per crank101 centimeter / 39.76 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSeafishing
- Price range~ €169.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size6000D-H
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.43/150

Penn FIERCE IV
Spinning
68.90 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.07 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag5.5kg / 12,13lbs
Weight280g / 9.88oz
Line retireve per crank84 centimeter / 33.07 inch
Ball bearings4+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €65.70
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/235
Conclusion
Penn FIERCE IV 2500X edges out Daiwa BG MQ 6000D-HX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the gear ratio (6.2:1) and the line retrieve per crank (84 centimeter / 33.07 inch). Still, Daiwa BG MQ 6000D-HX holds its own with strengths like a weight of 430g / 15,17oz and a ball bearings of 6, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa BG MQ and Penn FIERCE IV?
Penn FIERCE IV 2500X
- A fast gear ratio of 10 out of 10 (6.2:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- 7 out of 10 (84 centimeter / 33.07 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Stella FK 2500 SX vs Daiwa 20 Saltiga (G) 14000-XHX


Shimano Stella FK 2500 SX vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 5000X


Shimano 21 Stradic SW 5000 PGX vs Daiwa Crosscast Surf 35 SCW QD Type R


Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X vs Daiwa Lexa E LT 19 3000X


Shimano 21 Stradic SW 5000 PGX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-CXH(U)X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-CXH(U)X vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 3000D-CXH 3000D-CXHX


Daiwa Crosscast Surf 35 SCW QD Type R vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 4000X vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 5000X


Daiwa 19 Certate 4000CXHX vs Shimano 2020 Saragosa SW A 20000 PGX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX vs Shimano Stella FK 2500 SX


Daiwa 23 Caldia SW 4000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 Saltiga 6000-HX


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 5000X vs Shimano Stella FK 2500 SX


Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X vs Shimano 21 Stradic SW 6000 PGX


Daiwa 19 Certate 4000CXHX vs Daiwa Crosscast Surf 35 SCW QD Type R


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 5000-CX vs Shimano 21 Stradic SW 5000 PGX


Daiwa 23 Saltiga 6000-HX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 3000D-CXH 3000D-CXHX


Daiwa 23 Caldia SW 4000D-CXHX vs Shimano 2020 Saragosa SW A 20000 PGX


Daiwa 23 Saltiga 6000-HX vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 5000X


Daiwa 19 Certate 4000CXHX vs Daiwa 20 Saltiga (G) 14000-XHX


Shimano 2020 Saragosa SW A 20000 PGX vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 4000X
