Daiwa BG MQ 6000D-HX vs Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa BG MQ
Seafishing
56.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.56 out of 10
Ergonomics5.79 out of 10
Gear ratio5.7:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight430g / 15.17oz
Line retireve per crank101 centimeter / 39.76 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSeafishing
- Price range~ €169.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size6000D-H
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.43/150

Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R
Spinning
29.70 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.99 out of 10
Ergonomics2 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag2kg / 4.41 lbs
Weight320g / 11.29oz
Line retireve per crank76cm / 29.92 inch
Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €49.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500 DH
- Handle typeDouble handle
- Drag typeRead drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.18/290. 0.20/240, 0.25/160
Conclusion
Daiwa BG MQ 6000D-HX clearly outshines Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R, offering significantly better performance in weight (430g / 15,17oz) and ergonomics (5.79 out of 10). While Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa BG MQ 6000D-HX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa BG MQ and Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R?
Daiwa BG MQ 6000D-HX
- At 5.82 out of 10 (12kg / 26,46lbs), the drag is on the lighter side—suitable for smaller saltwater species or finesse-style presentations
- Scoring 8.77 out of 10 (430g / 15,17oz), this reel is lighter than expected for a saltwater model, which helps on long sessions without extra strain
Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.86 out of 10 (76cm / 29.92 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
Similar comparisons

Shimano 21 TwinPower SW 6000X vs Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 10000 HGX


Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa Emblem Surf 45 SCW Type R


Shimano 21 TwinPower SW 6000X vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano Stradic SWB 6000HGX vs Shimano Stradic SWB 4000XGX


Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano Spheros SW A 10000 PGX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CXHX


Shimano Stradic SWB 4000XGX vs Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 10000 HGX


Shimano 20 Stella 6000 HGX vs Daiwa Emblem Surf 45 SCW Type R


Shimano 2020 Saragosa SW A 10000 PGX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CXHX


Shimano 2020 Saragosa SW A 25000X vs Daiwa Ninja LT 4000-CX


Shimano 21 TwinPower SW 6000X vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CXHX


Shimano Spheros SW A 10000 PGX vs Daiwa 20 Saltiga (G) 18000-HX


Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X vs Shimano 20 Stella 6000 HGX


Daiwa Ninja LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Saltiga (G) 18000-HX


Daiwa Ninja LT 4000-CX vs Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 4000D-CXH 4000D-CXHX vs Shimano Spheros SW A 10000 PGX


Delphin INKS 3000X vs Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT4000-CX vs Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF


Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF vs Daiwa 23 Caldia SW 8000-HX


Daiwa Emblem Surf 45 SCW Type R vs Delphin INKS 3000X
