Daiwa BG MQ 8000-HX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa BG MQ
Seafishing
59.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.63 out of 10
Ergonomics5.49 out of 10
Gear ratio5.7:1
Maximum drag15kg / 33.07lbs
Weight635g / 22.4oz
Line retireve per crank110 centimeter / 43.31 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSeafishing
- Price range~ €189.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size8000-H
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.33/300

Daiwa 22 Exist LT
Spinning
88.70 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.47 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight160g / 5.64oz
Line retireve per crank72 centimeter / 28.35 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €668.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X clearly outshines Daiwa BG MQ 8000-HX, offering significantly better performance in gear ratio (5.1:1) and durability (9.5 out of 10). While Daiwa BG MQ 8000-HX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa BG MQ and Daiwa 22 Exist LT?
Daiwa BG MQ 8000-HX
- Scoring 8.5 out of 10 (6), the reel runs smooth under pressure
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.29 out of 10 (72 centimeter / 28.35 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa RX LT 2500X vs Shimano Spheros SW A 8000 HGX


Shimano Vanquish FC 4000XGCX vs Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 8000 PGX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CPX vs Shimano Stradic SWB 10000HGX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Vanquish FC 4000XGCX


Shimano Spheros SW A 8000 HGX vs Shimano Vanquish FC 4000XGCX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2500SX vs Shimano Complex XR 2500X


Shimano 2020 Saragosa SW A 10000 PGX vs Daiwa 21 Certate SW 10000-HX


Shimano Stradic SWB 10000HGX vs Daiwa 21 Certate SW 8000-PX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 21 Certate SW 8000-PX


Shimano Complex XR 2500X vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 5000-C(U)X vs Shimano 2020 Saragosa SW A 10000 PGX


Daiwa 23 Caldia SW 6000D-HX vs Shimano Spheros SW A 8000 HGX


Shimano Stradic SWB 10000HGX vs Daiwa 21 Certate SW 10000-HX


Daiwa 21 Certate SW 10000-HX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 5000-C(U)X


Shimano 21 Stradic SW 10000 HGX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2500SX


Shimano Vanquish FC 4000XGCX vs Shimano 2020 Saragosa SW A 10000 PGX


Shimano Complex XR 2500X vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2500SX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2500SX vs Daiwa BG MQ 8000-HX


Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 8000 PGX vs Daiwa BG MQ 8000-HX


Shimano 21 Stradic SW 10000 HGX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX
