Daiwa BG MQ 8000-HX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2000S-XHX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa BG MQ
Seafishing
59.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.63 out of 10
Ergonomics5.49 out of 10
Gear ratio5.7:1
Maximum drag15kg / 33.07lbs
Weight635g / 22.4oz
Line retireve per crank110 centimeter / 43.31 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSeafishing
- Price range~ €189.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size8000-H
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.33/300

Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT
Spinning
76.60 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability7.67 out of 10
Ergonomics6.4 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight180g / 6.35oz
Line retireve per crank81 centimeter / 31.89 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €84.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000S-XH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2000S-XHX edges out Daiwa BG MQ 8000-HX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the gear ratio (6.2:1) and the line retrieve per crank (81 centimeter / 31.89 inch). Still, Daiwa BG MQ 8000-HX holds its own with strengths like a maximum drag of 15kg / 33,07lbs, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa BG MQ and Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT?
Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2000S-XHX
- A fast gear ratio of 10 out of 10 (6.2:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- 6.57 out of 10 (81 centimeter / 31.89 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX vs Penn Battle III 3000X


Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano TLD 20X


Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 8000 PGX vs Penn Battle III 3000X


Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 8000 PGX vs Shimano 21 Stradic SW 5000 XGX


Delphin SHARX 6000X vs Shimano 2020 Saragosa SW A 18000 HGX


Delphin SHARX 6000X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX


Daiwa 23 Caldia SW 10000-HX vs Delphin YUPIE


Shimano 2020 Saragosa SW A 18000 HGX vs Shimano 21 Stradic SW 5000 XGX


Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 XGX vs Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 10000 HGX


Shimano 2020 Saragosa SW A 18000 HGX vs Shimano TLD 20X


Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX vs Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 5000 XGX


Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX vs Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 5000 XGX


Shimano 2020 Saragosa SW A 5000 XGX vs Penn Battle III 3000X


Shimano 2020 Saragosa SW A 5000 XGX vs Shimano 21 Stradic SW 5000 XGX


Shimano Vanquish FC C2000SCX vs Shimano 21 Stradic SW 5000 XGX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2000X vs Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX


Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa Emblem Surf 45 SCW Type R


Delphin YUPIE vs Delphin SHARX 6000X


Shimano TLD 20X vs Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 10000 HGX


Penn Battle III 3000X vs Delphin SHARX 6000X
