Daiwa BG MQ 8000-HX vs Penn Battle III 6000X

The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa BG MQ

Seafishing

59.60 out of 100

Value for money4 out of 5

Quality classGood

Durability4.63 out of 10

Ergonomics5.49 out of 10

Gear ratio5.7:1

Maximum drag15kg / 33.07lbs

Weight635g / 22.4oz

Line retireve per crank110 centimeter / 43.31 inch

Ball bearings6

Technical Specifications

BrandDAIWA
The main category of the reelSeafishing
Price range~ €189.33
Is saltwater resistantNo
Spare spoolNo
Reel size8000-H
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.33/300

Penn Battle III

Spinning

67.10 out of 100

Value for money3.5 out of 5

Quality classMedium

Durability7.81 out of 10

Ergonomics4 out of 10

Gear ratio5.6:1

Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs

Weight590g / 20.81oz

Line retireve per crank104 centimeter / 40.94 inch

Ball bearings6

Technical Specifications

BrandPENN
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €113.30
Is saltwater resistantYes
Spare spoolNo
Reel size6000
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.46/310

Conclusion

Both Daiwa BG MQ 8000-HX and Penn Battle III 6000X perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa BG MQ 8000-HX offers a weight of 635g / 22,4oz, while Penn Battle III 6000X stands out for a line retrieve per crank of 104 centimeter / 40.94 inch. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.

What's the difference between Daiwa BG MQ and Penn Battle III?

Penn Battle III 6000X

The reel brings in line quickly with its 8.8 out of 10 (5.6:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
A high retrieve rate of 9.9 out of 10 (104 centimeter / 40.94 inch), means the reel is made just for speed, perfect for speed fishing or covering water quickly
Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.