Daiwa BG 2000X vs Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa BG
Spinning
73.70 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability7.69 out of 10
Ergonomics6.2 out of 10
Gear ratio5.6:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight240g / 8.47oz
Line retireve per crank75 centimeter / 29.53 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €87.80
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/125

Penn International VISW
Multireels
64.70 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.98 out of 10
Ergonomics3.4 out of 10
Gear ratio3.1:1/1.5:1
Maximum drag29.4kg / 64,82lbs
Weight3205g / 113.05oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings5
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €979.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size80
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeLever drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.76/1435
Conclusion
Both Daiwa BG 2000X and Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa BG 2000X offers a gear ratio of 5.6:1, while Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX stands out for a line retrieve per crank of 102 centimeter / 40.16 inch. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa BG and Penn International VISW?
Daiwa BG 2000X
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8.8 out of 10 (5.6:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a score like 8.4 out of 10 (240g / 8,47oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX vs Daiwa Tanacom 750


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2500 S-XHX vs Shimano Stella FK 4000 MX


Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX vs Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 4000-C(U)X vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX


Shimano Catana FE 4000 HGX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX


Daiwa Tanacom 750 vs Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX


Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX


Shimano Stella FK 4000 MX vs Delphin BRONZ 6000X


Shimano Torium 16PGAX vs Shimano Stella FK 4000 MX


Daiwa Tanacom 750 vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2500 S-XHX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX vs Shimano Catana FE 4000 HGX


Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2500 S-XHX vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX


Shimano Talica II 12IIAX vs Shimano Stella FK 4000 MX


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Penn FIERCE IV 2500X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 4000-C(U)X vs Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX


Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX vs Shimano Catana FE 4000 HGX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 5000-CX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX
