Daiwa BG 3000X vs Daiwa 23 Caldia SW 6000D-HX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa BG
Spinning
68.30 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability7.74 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.6:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight305g / 10.76oz
Line retireve per crank95 centimeter / 37.4 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €98.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/220

Daiwa 23 Caldia SW
Seafishing
63.20 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.71 out of 10
Ergonomics5.79 out of 10
Gear ratio5.7:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight425g / 14.99oz
Line retireve per crank101 centimeter / 39.76 inch
Ball bearings6+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSeafishing
- Price range~ €213.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size6000D-H
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.24/300
Conclusion
Both Daiwa BG 3000X and Daiwa 23 Caldia SW 6000D-HX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa BG 3000X offers a line retrieve per crank of 95 centimeter / 37.4 inch, while Daiwa 23 Caldia SW 6000D-HX stands out for a maximum drag of 12kg / 26,46lbs. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa BG and Daiwa 23 Caldia SW?
Daiwa BG 3000X
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8.8 out of 10 (5.6:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- A high retrieve rate of 9 out of 10 (95 centimeter / 37.4 inch), means the reel is made just for speed, perfect for speed fishing or covering water quickly
Daiwa 23 Caldia SW 6000D-HX
- At 5.82 out of 10 (12kg / 26,46lbs), the drag is on the lighter side—suitable for smaller saltwater species or finesse-style presentations
- Scoring 8.79 out of 10 (425g / 14,99oz), this reel is lighter than expected for a saltwater model, which helps on long sessions without extra strain
Similar comparisons

Shimano Catana FE 4000X vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 1000X


Shimano Spheros SW A 6000 HGX vs Cormoran Spoon Trout 8PiF


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 1000X vs Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 14000 XGX


Shimano 2020 Saragosa SW A 5000 XGX vs Daiwa GS LTD 3000X


Shimano 21 Stradic SW 5000 XGX vs Shimano Stella FK 4000 MX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 5000-CX vs Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2000X vs Shimano 21 Stradic SW 5000 XGX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 1000DX


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2000X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000DX vs Shimano Stella FK 4000 MX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2000X


Shimano Stradic SWB 4000XGX vs Daiwa BG MQ 2500-HX


Daiwa 24 Certate SW 5000-HX vs Shimano 21 Stradic SW 5000 XGX


Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 1000X


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa Emblem Surf Light 45 SCW QD- P


Cormoran Spoon Trout 8PiF vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 1000DX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 5000-CX vs Shimano 21 Stradic SW 5000 XGX


Cormoran Spoon Trout 8PiF vs Daiwa 24 Certate SW 5000-HX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 1000X vs Shimano Catana FE 4000X


Shimano Stradic SWB 4000XGX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000DX
