Daiwa BG 4500X vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CPX

Daiwa BG
Spinning
55.80 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability7.83 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.7:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight625g / 22.05oz
Line retireve per crank109 centimeter / 42.91 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €117.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.35/320

Daiwa 20 Fuego LT
Spinning
60.00 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.22 out of 10
Gear ratio4.8:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight235g / 8.29oz
Line retireve per crank75 centimeter / 29.53 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €74.80
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000-CP
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Both Daiwa BG 4500X and Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CPX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa BG 4500X offers a durability of 7.83 out of 10, while Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CPX stands out for a maximum drag of 12kg / 26,46lbs. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa BG and Daiwa 20 Fuego LT?
Daiwa BG 4500X
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CPX
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (12kg / 26,46lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- With a score like 8.43 out of 10 (235g / 8,29oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.71 out of 10 (75 centimeter / 29.53 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
Similar comparisons

Shimano FX 1000 FCX vs Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R


Shimano Catana FE 1000X vs Mitchell 308 PRO 2000X


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000XGFEX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500X


Shimano Sedona FJ 1000FJX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX


Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R vs Shimano Ultegra C3000HGDX


Mitchell 308 PRO 2000X vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500SFJX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2000X vs Shimano Ultegra C3000HGDX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2500X vs Shimano Sahara FJ 1000X


Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R vs Shimano Catana FE 1000X


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2000X vs Shimano Catana FE 1000X


Shimano Ultegra C3000HGDX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000XGFEX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Catana FE 1000X


Shimano Sahara FJ 1000X vs Shimano Sedona FJ 1000FJX


Shimano Catana FE 1000X vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2500X


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2000X vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2000X


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500SFJX vs Shimano Catana FE 1000X


Shimano FX 1000 FCX vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CX


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500SFJX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2500X


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2000X vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 1000X


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 1000X
